Swimming in the Pensieve

2005.09.20, Tuesday

LBUSD White Lies

Filed under: Long Beach Unified SD, Domesticity, Education — Allan @ 22:54:41

It’s time to set the story straight for those who depend too heavily on what the school district has to say to you.

Back on the 9th of this month, I noticed the following bit of Rah! Rah! text on the LBUSD website. Have a look:

Job Turnover Down; Teacher Retention UpANON

2005.09.09


The job turnover of experienced teachers leaving the district to take positions in other school districts has declined to 49, down from 66 teachers four years ago. In contrast, far more teachers from other school districts—1,552 experienced teachers—applied to teach here in the last year. That’s a ratio of more than 31 experienced teacher applicants for every experienced teacher vacancy.

Why are hundreds of experienced teachers seeking employment here?

The top reasons given by the applicants themselves attest to the quality of the Long Beach Unified School District. Approximately eight out of 10 teacher applicants mentioned one or more of these factors in their decision to apply here:

• 78 percent cited competitive teacher salaries.

• 80 percent indicated the district’s strong academic focus was an important factor in seeking to teach here.

• 77 percent said the district’s excellent staff development opportunities for teachers were attractive.

• 79 percent indicated the district’s support for newly hired teachers was desirable.

“We’re encouraged that so many excellent, experienced teachers want to work here,” said Ruth Ashley, assistant superintendent of Human Resource Services. “We’re also pleased by the reasons teachers give for applying to teach here. They know this is an excellent place to teach.”

Last year the district hired 386 teachers; 44 percent of them were experienced teachers. This year only 199 new teachers were hired. Forty-nine percent of these new hires are experienced teachers. Ninety-seven of the 199 have more than a year of teaching experience.

The school district is California’s third largest and has more than 5,000 teachers.

Article Published: Friday, September 09, 2005

http://www.lbusd.k12.ca.us/public_information/n050909b.asp
© 2005 Long Beach Unified School District

Let’s nudge the Bandini® out of the way right now. If you start writing “Rah-Rah!” administrative morale boosters or Board of Ed spin docs, please don’t use the kind of statements you get from fawning job applicants. They will tell you exactly what you want to hear, because you make it pretty darned obvious what it is you do want to hear. Using anything like this from incoming prospects for hire is simply an attempt to reinforce your argument to common belief. What you should do is exit interview your departing employees in an attempt to find out just how you drove them away–if you even care.

Give me a few district employees and a guarantee of anonymity (I don’t need it, they do), and I’ll tell you what the bulk of your employees really think of the chore that you’ve made out of working for LBUSD. I’d also be willing to bet that they can come up with some common sense solutions that hold better prospects of actually working than any orders issued thus far by the likes of Steinhauser.

LBUSD has taught us that what they say is less important than what they leave unsaid, and my mind immediately jumped to why Steinhauser–or his cronies–felt it necessary to make the ridiculous jump over three of the highest years of teacher loss that LBUSD has experienced to date; and compare this years numbers with those of 4 years ago. Then I remembered the comments of TALB President, Tony Diaz, only this past June:

Comments of TALB President, Tony Diaz2005.06.18


In a span of eight days, the Press-Telegram’s Editorial Board attacked the highly respected unions representing the hard-working police officers and teachers of our community. It also praised the governor for attacking the state employee unions in his ill-conceived $80 million special election set for November. Your readers, many of whom are parents of the students we teach, deserve better from the only daily newspaper in Long Beach.

Your Editorial Board lamented the demise of a productive relationship between the district and the 5,000-member Teachers Association of Long Beach. What we have had in Long Beach for too long is a joint effort to give the district nothing but positive public relations.

Almost 500 teachers left our district last year, a 10 percent turnover. It’s impossible to retain our best teachers, and keep their morale high, when they have poor compensation and few contractual rights.

There is no process at all for teachers to seek relief from abusive principals, other than to transfer out of that school. Our teachers lack basic rights found in almost all teacher contracts, including due process, safeguards against retaliatory reassignments and transfers, and other basic rights that would treat our educators as professionals at no cost to taxpayers.

If the school board had taken seriously the concerns of many teachers and parents, rather than following the superintendent’s support for fellow administrators (right or wrong), public disputes over ineffective principals would have been dealt with in a timely manner.

Tony Diaz
President, Teachers Association of Long Beach

Published: Saturday, June 18, 2005 - 7:17:16 AM PST

http://www.dailynews.com/Stories/0,1413,204%257E23185%257E2927865,00.html
© 2005 Los Angeles Newspaper Group

Last year, LBUSD lost almost 500 experienced teachers. They then hired 170 experienced teachers and 216 inexperienced teachers, leaving the district at a teacher defecit of almost 114–a net loss in body count and a dismal failure in terms of experienced teacher count–for the single-year interval in question.

Considering how bad-off your children are in the classroom, one would say that’s sufficient to be ticked-off at LBUSD; however, the above, compared with other (non-LBUSD) sources of information is enough to make your blood boil. Read further:

School District Faces Contract For TeachersBy Harry Saltzgaver, Executive Editor

2005.09.15


Long Beach Unified School District administrators, fresh from cutting about $20 million out of the current budget, now are girding for negotiations with a newly aggressive teachers union.

The school district’s contract with Teachers Association of Long Beach expired Aug. 31. In the past, the contracts have run for three years, with salary renegotiated each year. The entire contract is open this year, and TALB has released a “Teachers Demand Respect” bargaining proposal that calls for significant changes in the way the district does business as well as sizable raises.

TALB’s board has changed in the past year, according to records, and new management has taken the reins at the union. That leadership started pressing for change - most noticeably leading an effort to censure or replace some principals - last spring.

Its first bargaining proposal “demands positive changes” in 23 areas, including first-ever clauses on “respect, dignity and due process” for teachers and a “professional collaboration” team with the power to hire and evaluate administrators.

“The bottom line is, the budget is what the budget is,” Superintendent Chris Steinhauser said. “We’re facing rising health care and workers comp costs, and we’ve been mandated to raise our legal reserves from $7 million to $14 million. At the same time, we’re losing revenue.

“Everything people want has a price tag. If you get one thing, we have to take it from somewhere. The bottom line is, we have to live within our means.

The LBUSD school board will conduct a public hearing Tuesday at its next meeting to “sunshine” TALB’s proposal, and will offer its own counter-proposal at the same time. After two weeks for the public and union to review the district’s proposal, there will be another hearing at the Oct. 4 school board meeting. Negotiations will follow.

Union officials did not return calls seeking comment. However, in a press release on Aug. 30, bargaining chair Bob Joplin claimed there was teacher discontent and low morale that could only be addressed with a better contract.

“Our bargaining proposal is centered on getting our teachers the respect that they deserve,” Joplin says in the statement. “We’ve had 25% of our teachers leave the district the last three years and the Board of Education has yet to respond to that exodus in any meaningful way. Our bargaining proposal addresses the working conditions and compensation issues that our teachers most want fixed.”

Steinhauser disputed the assertions that there is discontent and that teachers are leaving. He said that declining enrollment has reduced the number of teaching positions available, and only 89 experienced teachers left the district in the last year to teach elsewhere. Most of the “exodus” is due to retirements or other attrition, he said.

“We had 1,500 experienced teachers apply for jobs here this year,” Steinhauser said. “That’s 17 experienced teachers for every vacancy. People want to teach here. Our compensation package compares well with the area. We want our teachers to have the best salaries possible, but you have to look at the whole package when you compare.”

Long Beach teachers do not pay any insurance premiums for health coverage, unlike many nearby schools, Steinhauser said. Teacher salary schedules are extremely complicated and difficult to compare due to factors such as graduate work, experience and special skills, but TALB’s claim that Long Beach is the 39th of 40 districts in comparative pay is simply wrong.

According to the Los Angeles County district survey of salaries and fringe benefits for the 2003-04 school year, Long Beach ranged between second and 22nd on a series of pay scales, and appeared in the top 10 of most schedules.

After automatic pay raises and a restructuring of the pay schedule last year, the average annual teacher salary in Long Beach is $55,850 for 182 days of work, according to Chris Eftychiou, the district’s public information director. A new teacher with full credentials starts at $43,227 a year.

While money is always an issue in any contract, Steinhauser said a larger concern may be a demand by the union to create “Professional Collaboration Teams” at each school. The union proposal would give these teams control over individual schools, including hiring of new administrators and teachers, evaluation of administrators, creation of school curriculum and discipline policies and more.

Most of the two pages of demands are unrealistic, Steinhauser said.

“There are two things you simply don’t get to do,” Steinhauser said. “One is to hire or fire your own boss, and the other is to evaluate your boss’ job performance. We have an extensive complaint process, and we follow it. But you don’t get to pick your boss.”

The union has posted its entire bargaining proposal on the Internet at www.talb.org. Tuesday’s board meeting begins at 5 p.m. at the school district’s administration building, 1515 Hughes Way.

An agenda will be posted at least 72 hours in advance at the administration building and on the school’s Web site, www.lbusd.k12.ca.us. For more information, call 997-8240.

Published: Thursday, September 15, 2005

http://www.gazettes.com/teacher09152005.html
© 2005 Gazettes.com

Wait a minute…25% of a workforce of 5000+ got up and left over the past 3 years…500 of them last year alone? 1250+ experienced teachers left LBUSD since Steinhauser got his shiney, new, contract; and nobody in this town can put 1 and 1 together to come up with 2. That pretty-much explains why LBUSD (Steinhauser, most likely) doesn’t want to look at the facts, or publish figures that verify the valid criticisms that can only come to bear against Steinhauser himself. The man chases away the good teachers, and keeps the ones who game the numbers for the SAT-9’s.

To Steinhauser’s statement of not getting to evaluate your boss: I’ve participated in organizations wherein it was policy to evaluate our own bosses, and the system–with certain checks and balances in place–works quite well. I find it interesting that only the truly bad bosses kicked and screamed at the prospect of the employees under their span of control evaluating them. The good bosses had no problem with the practice whatsoever; and the bad bosses found a different organization to infest. Given the excesses practiced by site administrators; which have flourished under Steinhauser’s reign, I’d wager that he’s terrorized by the awareness that, if his employees evaluated his performance over the term of his contract, he’d be out on his ear in the gutter–yesterday.

Annie just raised the point that Michael Brown’s employees evaluated him and found him lacking…and nobody listened to them either. (Don’t go and tell her; but, not only do I love her, I really like her too.) I’ll add to that remark by mentioning that Steinhauser and the Board were quoted, in the Press Telegram, as being of the position that even parents have no input into the process of evaluating a site administrator. That certainly looks like a NO-ACCOUNTability position to me.

It’s Only a Lie Between ‘Friends’

If you keep reading, you’ll run across some LBUSD quotes that reveal that Steinhauser will tell you what he thinks you want to hear, and turn-around and do exactly what he wants to do (See The Endless March of the Morons: Just Another Sunny Day in LBUSD, below). What this district needs is to invest our tax dollars in somebody who can do something as rare as tell the unequivocating truth, face an intelligent adversary, and keep his word. What we are stuck with now is a waste of human flesh.

fuzz graphic gradient

1 Comment

  1. Host: 144.142.21.5 (lye1.latimes.com)
    Http Code: 200 Date: Sep 12 16:33:55 Http Version: HTTP/1.0
    Referer: http://gabston-howell.org/wl/2005/09/20/lbusd-white-lies/
    Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
    |
    Http Code: 200 Date: Sep 12 16:33:56 Http Version: HTTP/1.0
    Referer: http://gabston-howell.org/wl/2005/09/20/lbusd-white-lies/
    Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
    |
    Http Code: 200 Date: Sep 12 16:33:56 Http Version: HTTP/1.0
    Referer: http://gabston-howell.org/wl/2005/09/20/lbusd-white-lies/
    Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
    |
    Http Code: 200 Date: Sep 12 16:33:56 Http Version: HTTP/1.0
    Referer: http://gabston-howell.org/wl/2005/09/20/lbusd-white-lies/
    Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)

    Comment by lye1.latimes.com — 2006.09.12, Tuesday @ 16:34:55

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Locations of visitors to this page